Research Article

Amino Acids Composition of Maggot, Earthworm, Termite and Chicken Viscera Meals Used as Proteins Sources in Fish Feeding  

Arnauld S.M. Djissou1 , Isidore Odjo1 , Theophile Godome1 , Shunsuke Koshio2 , Emile D. Fiogbe1
1 Laboratory of Research on Wet Lands, LRZH/FAST/University of Abomey Calavi, Benin
2 Laboratory of Aquatic Animal Nutrition, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan
Author    Correspondence author
International Journal of Aquaculture, 2018, Vol. 8, No. 23   doi: 10.5376/ija.2018.08.0023
Received: 10 Sep., 2018    Accepted: 17 Oct., 2018    Published: 26 Oct., 2018
© 2018 BioPublisher Publishing Platform
This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Preferred citation for this article:

Djissou A.S.M., Odjo I., Godome T., Koshio S., and Fiogbe E.D., 2018, Amino acids composition of maggot, earthworm, termite and chicken viscera meals used as proteins sources in fish feeding, International Journal of Aquaculture, 8(23): 168-175 (doi: 10.5376/ija.2018.08.0023)

 

Abstract

The present study was conducted to compare the nutritive value of animal protein sources such as maggot meal (MM), earthworm meal (EM), termite meal (TM) and chicken viscera meal (CM) for fish feeding. Amino acids composition was determined in triplicate by HPLC method. These sources were rich in crude protein (54.30-71.8%), crude fat (10.7-18.7%) and crude fibre (5.7-9.7%). The total amino acid ranged from 18.8 to 57.19 g/100 g of crude protein and the percentages of essential amino acids were 61.58% (MM), 46.21% (EM), 32.02% (TM) and 45.72% (CM). CM was the richest in total acid amino acid (Aspartic acid and Glutamic acid) than other protein sources whereas basic amino acid (Histidine, Lysine and Arginine) was higher in MM than others. Leucine has the most concentrated amino acid in MM, EM and CM whereas there is phenylalanine in TM. Predicted protein efficiency ratio (P-PER1 and P-PER2) values were (2.16, 2.14) MM, (0.68, 0.67) EM, (0.79, 0.27) TM, and (1.20, 1.13) CM respectively; isoelectric point (pI) ranged from 1.10 to 3.65; chemical index (ICh) values were: (1.07) MM, (0.24) EM, (0.11) TM and (0.61) CM. Consequently, the results showed that MM was better at 76.47%, CM in 17.64% while TM was better at 5.88%. Based on these, maggot, earthworm and chicken viscera would be recommended as alternative protein sources to fish meal, especially maggot for fish feeding.

Keywords
Nutritive value; Fish feeding; Predicted protein efficiency ratio
[Full-Text PDF] [Full-Text HTML]
International Journal of Aquaculture
• Volume 8
View Options
. PDF(0KB)
. HTML
Associated material
. Readers' comments
Other articles by authors
. Arnauld S.M. Djissou
. Isidore Odjo
. Theophile Godome
. Shunsuke Koshio
. Emile D. Fiogbe
Related articles
. Nutritive value
. Fish feeding
. Predicted protein efficiency ratio
Tools
. Email to a friend
. Post a comment